DECISION-MAKING SCOPE

SFDT holders have a say in a wide range of critical decisions affecting both gameplay and the platform’s overall development.
This decision-making scope ensures that community interests are well-represented in the evolution of SkyFleet Dash.

Community Discussions

Before any proposal is put to a vote, SkyFleet Dash encourages open community discussions to ensure transparency and informed decision-making. These pre-vote discussions provide an opportunity for users to ask questions, share feedback, and explore the potential impact of a proposal. By allowing time for dialogue, the platform fosters consensus-building and thoughtful participation from the community. To support this process, SkyFleet Dash hosts dedicated discussion channels on platforms such as Discord and within the official app. These spaces enable players, investors, and contributors to engage in real-time debates, clarify proposal details, and exchange diverse viewpoints. This structured dialogue helps ensure that when governance proposals reach the voting stage, participants are well-informed and aligned with the platform’s long-term vision.

Types of Decisions Influenced by the Community

The governance framework of SkyFleet Dash empowers SFDT holders to actively shape the direction of the platform through voting on key decisions across economic, developmental, and community-driven areas.

Game Economy Adjustments

One of the central areas where community input plays a role is in managing the in-game economy. Holders can vote on adjustments to the GC-to-SFDT conversion rate to ensure that the equilibrium between in-game and real-world value reflects both gameplay dynamics and broader market conditions. Similarly, decisions involving conversion fees, caps, and minimum thresholds may also be governed by community vote. These choices help manage token circulation and maintain inflation control within the ecosystem.

Tokenomics and Supply Adjustments

Community members also have the power to influence core tokenomics. This includes voting on changes to the SFDT burn rate, whether applied to transactions, conversions, or other activities. Adjusting the burn rate allows the community to apply deflationary pressure when appropriate, helping to protect long-term token value. Additionally, decisions around stakingsuch as reward rates, distribution intervals, or the launch of limited-time staking events are also subject to governance, giving holders a say in how passive income opportunities are structured.

Platform and Game Development

Beyond economics, community governance extends into content development and gameplay evolution. SFDT holders can vote on the introduction of new features, game modes, or expansions, enabling players to guide the direction of future content. Game balance updates, such as modifications to character stats or item performance, can also be proposed and approved through community consensus to ensure a fair and engaging experience. Furthermore, the community can influence the scheduling and structure of in-game events and tournaments, shaping the pace and excitement of the gaming environment.

Partnerships and Collaborations

Community members also contribute to strategic growth by voting on ecosystem partnerships. This may include collaborations with other blockchain projects, brands, or platforms that add utility or visibility to SkyFleet Dash. Additionally, proposals for NFT collaborations such as branded assets, limited-edition collections, or interoperable items with other games are presented for community approval to ensure they reflect the interests and values of the player base.

Community and Marketing Initiatives

Governance plays a critical role in community-building strategies. SFDT holders can propose and vote on programs such as referral rewards, ambassador initiatives, or loyalty incentives that drive user growth and engagement. Decisions related to airdrops, including their frequency, distribution structure, and eligibility criteria, are also shaped by the community, ensuring these initiatives reward meaningful participation and align with long-term retention goals.

Governance and Voting Policy Updates

Finally, the community holds the authority to refine the governance process itself. This includes voting on changes to eligibility requirements for voters, minimum proposal thresholds, and the underlying voting power model. Adjustments to the voting schedule and frequency can also be made, allowing the governance system to remain responsive to the evolving needs of the ecosystem